Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/09/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fuji GFX compared to Leica SL
From: john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster)
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:10:50 +0000
References: <95eae7cb091e4b8eb56b30314d851da3@WhizzEXM01.whizz.org> <15753988052-2e83-a41a@webprd-a24.mail.aol.com> <9A7FBE11-5024-4D1E-97C9-4A97196120F5@gmail.com>

The S2 was the first camera to be smaller than a pro FF - compared to my 
R9/DMR

http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/386216-2/R9DMR-S2_side.jpg

john

-----Original Message-----

>From what I read and saw, I believe the new fuji aims at bringing more 
>acreage into a body that can actually be carried and used on the field like 
>a FF.
I don't know its specs but the ergonomics speak volumes. Not much larger 
than a Nikon, and features the wheels of an XT-1/2.
Trying to compare it with a 500CC equipped with a digital back is 
questionable; different cameras for different uses I guess.

Amities
Philippe

Le 22 sept. 2016 ? 22:31, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> a ?crit :

> You are most likely right, but there are (at least) 2 important questions 
> to ask.... can I justify/afford a completely new system to achieve better 
> technical results (an expense of $35+++k). And does my personal style and 
> output NEED these better results
> 
> In my case, and, of course, YMMV, the much considered answer is no.
> 
> I use a Hasselblad 500c with various lenses, and a Leaf Aptus 65 back....  
> the MFDB dates from about 2006. The resultant setup is still more precise 
> than I need.
> 
> Frank Filippone Red735i at verizon.net
> On Thursday, September 22, 2016, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote:
> 
> I am afraid to say that Hasselblad V lenses show their limitations on an 
> S, native lenses are far better....
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> A really nice nteresting visual comparison shows the 2 cameras to be quite 
> similar in styling, when viewed head-on.
> 
> Placement of user buttons is almost identical. More interesting is that 
> the SL is actually larger than the GFX, but has the smaller sensor.
> 
> If I were in the MF market, the Leica S family might be higher on my short 
> list. Hard to beat Leica glass....
> 
> Hassy V glass is pretty good too! (And I own it....)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

----------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail was checked for spam by the freeware edition of CleanMail.
The freeware edition is restricted to personal and non-commercial use.
You can remove this notice by purchasing a commercial license:
http://antispam.byteplant.com/products/cleanmail/index.html


Replies: Reply from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] Fuji GFX compared to Leica SL)
In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] Fuji GFX compared to Leica SL)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Fuji GFX compared to Leica SL)
Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] Fuji GFX compared to Leica SL)