Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/05/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't have the SL, nor even the M240, but is "image quality, vs the M240, significantly improved with M lenses" to be your primary objective? If so, I can't imagine how the SL would be significantly better than the M240 with M lens. On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all. > > I'm contemplating selling some gear (M240, M21mm/1,4 ASPH, Sony A7r II > modified by Kolarivision for Leica WA lenses) plus some cash for an SL and > the 24-90. > > Two questions: > 1. Given a large collection of recent generation M lenses, are there any > known issues? MINOR degradation at the corners of images made with WA > lenses used wide open are not a big deal to me. > > 2. Is there a noticeable positive difference in raw files? What > differences (positive or negative). > > Bottom line, is the image quality, vs the M240, significantly improved > with M lenses to warrant this move? Not really talking about the > differences in how one works with the two systems. > > Thanks in advance for your input, > Bob > > > Bob Adler > www.robertadlerphotography.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- "Some People Drive, We Are Driven" // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> richardmanphoto on Facebook and Instagram <https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto>