Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/07/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] noct .95 ?
From: rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler)
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:11:05 -0700
References: <268387B0-20F8-4C31-87B5-A6FC5D279531@mac.com> <CAAsXt4N9BphLjWD7uHt8knUkxNaB+JzNQKZmsbVQaUWFue_MkQ@mail.gmail.com> <MMXP123MB140825DBCD64CC56FA7781FDF9A10@MMXP123MB1408.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <0076F376-3ABF-4165-8E99-7B8ED1EB90EF@cartersxrd.net> <C702440B-B42E-47CA-A472-9A36ADBE6266@mac.com> <E6BBA509-B0A5-44BD-8095-22FF8F6D799B@gmail.com>

Both noctiluxes can now be used in full daylight wide open. With the SL 
having an electronic shutter speed capable of 1/16,000 sec (apparently ISO 
dependent) it is no problem...
There. I just got you thinking about parting with about $12,000 US!

Best,
Bob

Bob Adler
www.robertadlerphotography.com

> On Jul 18, 2017, at 3:19 PM, lluisripollphotography 
> <lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Steve,
> 
> I?ve never owned a Nocti because for my style I would rarely use it wide 
> open, on the other hand is an expensive and quite big lens. However I?ve 
> tested all the versions of the Nocti, the 1.2, the 1.0 E58 and E60, and 
> the 0.95. If I could afford one I would be decided for the 1.0, the 0.95 
> is absolute perfection, I think it can replace any other 50mm you have 
> (except the APO), the 1.0 is still magical?.. A friend of mine has bought 
> a minty 0,95 for 6.000 Euro, if you are patient you can find one.
> 
> Good luck my friend!
> 
> Amiti?s
> Lluis
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> El 19 jul 2017, a les 0:05, Steve Barbour <stevebarbour at mac.com> va 
>> escriure:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 18, 2017, at 2:38 PM, RicCarter <ric at cartersxrd.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> curious about why your preference for the 1 over the .95
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Yes, me too.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> and thank you all, for your help.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Steve
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> ric
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 18, 2017, at 5:26 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.uk> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> To be honest, I use my f1.0 far more than the f0.95.... but neither are 
>>>> for sale ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> john
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
In reply to: Message from stevebarbour at mac.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from stevebarbour at mac.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (lluisripollphotography) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)