Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/10/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] lightroom
From: photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:29:31 +0200
References: <77881C73-7403-43F5-AB31-E8BB68E5348B@gmail.com> <15f3361962f-c09-62a1@webjas-vae097.srv.aolmail.net>

Frank,

I think we mostly all agree i.e. LR is good, so long as it?s not too 
expensive, and as you still own your photos.

I?m currently using LR5 (stand alone by definition) but am limited to jpegs 
in my use of the X-T2 and X-T20. 

I tried LRCC but was not convinced of its merits as I don?t use the i-phone 
nor the i-pad for photos.

What you are saying regarding conversion below is precious. 

I?d hate having my original files on any cloud Philippe, I?d feel just as if 
I stored my film negs in the open on the sidewalk/pavement in front of the 
house ?
But I may (always) change my mind.

Amities
Philippe




> Le 19 oct. 2017 ? 08:45, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> a ?crit :
> 
> 
> 
> Not so sure I communicated properly.. if you use CC, and you do NOT pay, 
> your program is basically useless.  It will not work.
> 
> If you use ANY of the "perpetual license versions", you get no updates, 
> but you can always use it.  Using Adobe Camera Raw, a free program, you 
> can always have camera model updates that will allow you to convert from 
> RAW to some other format, and use your V1.0 of LR to process it... 
> 
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at verizon.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philippe <photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com>
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:19
> Subject: Re: [Leica] lightroom
> 
> That?s if you upgrade the camera body Jayanand.I could still run the 
> original LR 1.0 if I kept using the cameras I had at the 
> time.AmitiesPhilippe> Le 19 oct. 2017 ? 08:02, Jayanand Govindaraj 
> <jayanand at gmail.com> a ?crit :> > Adobe's perpetual licenses required 
> upgrades every two years which cost way> more than what I pay over two 
> years with the Cloud Subscription.> > Ditto for Microsoft Office.> > 
> Economically, the CC is the way to go!> > Cheers> Jayanand> > On Thu, Oct 
> 19, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net>> wrote:> >> 
> >> >> >> The standalone version of LR Will not be supported after Dec 31. 
> No more>> revisions, enhancements, added cameras, etc after that date.>> 
> Adobe is making so much money from the subscription service, the>> 
> additional income from the perpetual versions are no longer worth it. Or 
> so>> it appears.>> They now own us. You either pay your monthly fee or 
> your images are>> basically as you took them. Your enhancements, crops, 
> etc are no longer of>> any use. You would need to do them over again with 
> some other SW.>> If you have not figured it out yet, do not trust any 
> promises from Adobe.>> >> Frank Filippone>> Red735i at verizon.net>> >> >> 
> _______________________________________________>> Leica Users Group.>> See 
> http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information>> > > 
> _______________________________________________> Leica Users Group.> See 
> http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more 
> information_______________________________________________Leica Users 
> Group.See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] lightroom)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] lightroom)