Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/12/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Mojave--any pitfalls?
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 12:47:41 +0530
References: <2B707EDA-05EC-4D98-A877-D27689F1CF62@frozenlight.eu> <E094D720-DE0D-49CF-A450-47F626C0CF3E@gmail.com> <68A8009F-5B16-40F8-B1B0-058AD83724CB@frozenlight.eu> <D868A8C4-40EB-4B8C-AFEF-348AB3008C51@gmail.com> <09252E28-358A-45FB-BFD4-53E2FD13CE1A@gmail.com> <26E1EA14-37F6-43B8-82C8-1B52761FECBB@frozenlight.eu>

PS CC is 64 bit. It might have a 32 bit version too, PS6 had both.
Cheers
Jayanand

Sent from my iPad

> On 09-Dec-2018, at 11:26, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote:
> 
> I don?t know about PS, I only use Lightroom (6.7, the last 
> non-subscription version) which is 64-bit.
> 
> Cheers,
> Nathan
> 
> Nathan Wajsman
> 
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
> <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
> <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
> 
> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
> <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
> 
> YNWA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 9 Dec 2018, at 05:03, Bob Adler via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Good information Nathan. Thanks. 
>> Capture 1 v. 11 does not work with Mojave?s, but newly released v. 12 
>> (paid upgrade) does. 
>> But if it?s the 32bit apps that suffer, isn?t PS CC 32bit?
>> 
>> Bob Adler
>> www.robertadlerphotography.com
>> 
>>> On Dec 8, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Philippe via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks too - very precious for the guy here with the same aps as 
>>> Nathan?s :-)
>>> 
>>> Amities
>>> 
>>> Philippe
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Le 8 d?c. 2018 ? 17:52, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> a 
>>>> ?crit :
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks, that is helpful. Basically, 32-bit apps will not work or at 
>>>> least not particularly well. So no upgrade for me. I have Epson Scan, 
>>>> MS Office, Freeway Express and several other apps that are still 32-bit 
>>>> and while some can be upgraded, others cannot and anyway, I do not want 
>>>> to bother.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Nathan
>>>> 
>>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>>> 
>>>> Alicante, Spain
>>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
>>>> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
>>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
>>>> <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: 
>>>> http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
>>>> <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
>>>> 
>>>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
>>>> <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
>>>> 
>>>> YNWA
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 8 Dec 2018, at 16:36, CartersXRd via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I?ve been told that older, non-rental, versions of Adobe products may 
>>>>> have problems with latest version
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have not tried them ?still running Sierra
>>>>> 
>>>>> ric
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Dec 8, 2018, at 1:40 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My Mac asks me from time to time (including this morning) whether I 
>>>>>> want to upgrade to 10.14 (Mojave). I am now running 10.13.6 (High 
>>>>>> Sierra). Any particular reason for upgrading or NOT upgrading?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Nathan
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Alicante, Spain
>>>>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
>>>>>> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
>>>>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
>>>>>> <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: 
>>>>>> http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
>>>>>> <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
>>>>>> <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> YNWA
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] OT: Mojave--any pitfalls?)
In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] OT: Mojave--any pitfalls?)
Message from cartersxrd at gmail.com (CartersXRd) ([Leica] OT: Mojave--any pitfalls?)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] OT: Mojave--any pitfalls?)
Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] OT: Mojave--any pitfalls?)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] OT: Mojave--any pitfalls?)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] OT: Mojave--any pitfalls?)