Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2019/09/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 vs.... Computational Photography
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 10:19:37 +0200
References: <CAF8hL-FxJSu++avW10uekKCoP5bUDZ=6N7mmf-uwFRW6wAKOGQ@mail.gmail.com>

All you have to do is enlarge the image and it becomes obvious which is 
which. I took a guess before enlarging, and before checking the EXIF, and my 
initial guess was correct.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman

Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
<http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
<http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>

Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
<http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>

YNWA













> On 21 Sep 2019, at 10:04, Richard Man <richard at richardman.photo> wrote:
> 
> Without peeking at the EXIF etc. and just looking at the images, one is
> from the M9 with 35/1.4 ASPH and one is iPhone "Portrait Mode" (i.e. fake
> Bokeh), can you tell which one is which, and which one do you prefer?
> iPhone image is straight out from the camera and the M9 has some usual LR
> processing (e.g. 10 secs)
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/richardman/Statue-1.JPG.html
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/richardman/Statue-2.jpg.html
> 
> -- 
> "Some People Drive, We Are Driven"
> https://richardman.photo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 vs.... Computational Photography)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardman.photo (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 vs.... Computational Photography)