Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ben Ho wrote: >I am thinking of using 135/2.8R + 1.4X + 2X to get a very small size >378/f8. However, I am not sure if the optics will still be ok. > >Have anyone tried this before? Also, can we use 2 extenders at the same >time? (If workable, I will get the 1.4X.)>>>>>>> Hi Ben, Sorry I don't believe the 1.4 will fit on the 135R due to the protruding lens element of the 1.4 . However the 2X works fine on any Leica R lens, despite what the instruction book may say. I've used it on a 15mm and it's mind blowing stuff. :) Now if you really want to get carried away? Purchase 2 - 2X extenders and stack them. However, before I'd blow off in the neighbourhood of 5 grand for the extenders I'd buy a 180 2.8 that accepts the 1.4, there are two 180 versions. Don't get the latest even though it's an outstanding lens, as the 1.4 wont fit. Or if you do only the 2X works. That makes it 360mm. Get the early one, great lens and versitile because you can stack a 1.4 and 2X to-gether and shoot things you otherwise would not unless you had prime long glass. It's a matter of economics, is it better to use extenders stacked or the prime lens? If I found I required a long (280mm) a sufficient number of times I'd save the money and buy one, then you can add a 1.4 extender for a 400mm f4.0, a 2X for a 560mm. Or better still, you stack the 1.4 and 2X and have a hand holdable 800mm f 8.0! Piece of cake! :):) And it works just fine regardless of what they may tell you in Solms! Or from those who've never done it! I'm sure others will have entirely different concepts. ted Ted Grant This is Our Work. The Legacy of Sir William Osler. http://www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant