Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: noctilux 50 f1.0
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 17:29:42 -0400
References: <NCBBJJFDBJBLCEDPPLKGMEFHKJAA.msadat@pacbell.net> <3931AA75.1D2E62D2@home.com>

To whom this may concern (and it may not concern very many at all):  If
anyone on the LUG posts something that they particularly want me to read,
please do not have the word "filter"appear anywhere in the post.   Such
messages are automatically being filtered to the trash bin by my email reader.

Dan C.

 At 02:55 PM 13-06-00 -0700, you wrote:
>At 02:23 PM 6/13/00 -0700, mehrdad sadat wrote:
>>
>>Is there any reason Leica recommends against using a filter on this lens?
>> 
>>--------------------------------------------------------
>>Thanks
>>Mehrdad Sadat
>
>
>What kind of filter were you thinking of using?
>
>Jim
>
>

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: noctilux 50 f1.0)
In reply to: Message from mehrdad sadat <msadat@pacbell.net> ([Leica] noctilux 50 f1.0)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> ([Leica] WAS: noctilux vs. the cheap alternative. now 50mm)