Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] WAS: noctilux vs. the cheap alternative. now 50mm
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 16:28:55 -0700
References: <B556D41A.5168%harrison@mcclary.net> <39318CB2.F7E5076D@rabiner.cncoffice.com>

Mark Rabiner wrote:
> 
> Harrison & Ted:
> A 50 by any other name....
> The easiest and most useful lens to make.
> 1. Doesn't cost thousands, The 50 Summicron is the cheapest hunk of glass in the lineup.
> 2. When they want to come out with a special purpose optic, 9 out of 10 it's
> going to be done on a 50!
> Super high speed lens? put it on a 50!
> Super compact lens? make that a 50 as well.
> Blitz lens? a 50.
> Macro? one more 50.<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Damn Mark,  now I have to go out and buy one of each of all those 50's
cuas' I always like to have the right lens for the right shoot.  '-)    
    A one eyed smile. ;-)   

ted

Replies: Reply from Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: noctilux 50 f1.0)
Reply from Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com> ([Leica] Re: noctilux 50 f1.0)
In reply to: Message from Harrison Mcclary <harrison@mcclary.net> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)