Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Darrell Jennings wrote: > > Mark, not to pick on your comment, because I am not > sure how you intended "real" to be interpreted here. > But there is the crux of the issue...There are some > that think digital prints are not "real" prints. > Since silver and other wet dark room prints are > chemical/mechanical process, it seems to me that any > other chemical/mechanical process is just as "real". > It would be an interesting topic for a Leica poll. > How many of us think digital printing is just as > "real" as wet darkroom printing? The way i feel about it is Darkroom Printing is just as "real" and legit as inkjet and any other computer stuff but I don't feel an image on my computer screen is as "real" and legit as those prints on paper. Or someone opening up their laptop to show me their "portfolio." For me that does not cut it. Pixels don't impress me. The beef is on paper. Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.markrabiner.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html