Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug
From: "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 23:09:09 +0100
References: <3DD3F774000020E1@mta07.san.yahoo.com> <00bf01c28e36$6d6ddd50$70a72350@home> <003501c28e51$984d67a0$e96e9dac@aoldsl.net> <012a01c28e56$25f2b570$70a72350@home> <003501c28e7b$e89314b0$881f8ed1@leirex> <01d101c28e7f$736c66b0$70a72350@home> <009101c28e82$be8fc120$881f8ed1@leirex>

It seems to be that this problem with the infinity focus only occurs in
Canon SM lenses.
Rafael
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "SML" <leirex@access4less.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug


> Actually, I have never noticed what you described.  I might have disregard
> this which did not bother me at all.  When it comes to the Nikon 135, I
paid
> less than $200 for all of mine.  I have quite a few in my collection.
>
> David
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 1:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug
>
>
> At last, 2 hours ago I tried a late Canon lens on my M6. I used a SM-M
> adapter but the infinity was not in the center of the ring..... VERY
> displaced although the focus in the rangefinder was right . I have read
that
> problem with the Canon SM used in M cameras. But today I have seen it.
> Now there is a Nikon lens on ebay but 250$ ....almost the same that a
> Elmarit 135/2.8.
> Rafael
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "SML" <leirex@access4less.net>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 9:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug
>
>
> > If you don't mind using SM-M adapter, the Canon 135/3.5 and the Nikon
> > 135/3.5 are excellent choice at a bargain price.  I would go for one of
> > these two.
> >
> > Regards,
> > David
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es>
> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 8:26 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug
> >
> >
> > No Sonny,
> > I am not ignoring the advices. I know the quality of russian
lenses.......
> > excellent or a dog depending on your luck. I think the Apo-Telyt-M would
> be
> > the best of course or the tele-elmar but I have not 350$ or more to buy
> > them.
> > That is why I was asking for LOW COST 135mm lens.
> > Rafael
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "(SonC) Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com>
> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 4:53 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug
> >
> >
> > > Rafel,
> > > While I think the Cameraquest site is excellent in all respects, my
> > question
> > > to you is why did you start this thread on a Leica list if you
intended
> to
> > > ignore all the kind people who bothered to answer your question?
> > >
> > > Sonny
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es>
> > > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 6:39 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens
> > >
> > >
> > > > Thank you all for your advices.
> > > > I visited the www.cameraquest.com and Stephen Gandy says that Elmar
is
> > not
> > > > very sharp lens and Hektor chrome (coated) is not a very good lens
> > (prone
> > > to
> > > > fogging). I have the posibility to buy a Late Canon 135 3.5 lens
(not
> > > > senerar but later version) for 150 $ in mint condition.
> > > > Following Stephen Gandy recommendation the best 135mm SM lenses are
> > Nikon
> > > > and Canon
> > > > Any experiences with this lens,
> > > > Rafael
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: <ned@kajabbi.com>
> > > > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 11:49 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > Don't forget the 135 F2.8 Elmarit. Due to its weight it's VERY
> > > > undervalued.
> > > > > If you can handle the Noctilux, the Elmarit is a breeze and it
cuts
> a
> > > > super
> > > > > sharp image.
> > > > > >-- Original Message --
> > > > > >Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 19:21:01 +1100
> > > > > >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > > > > >From: Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au>
> > > > > >Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens
> > > > > >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>Hi all,
> > > > > >>I am looking for a 135mm lens for my M6. My budget is not full,
so
> I
> > > am
> > > > > >>looking for a good, cheap lens. As far as I know there are 3
> options
> > > in
> > > > > >SM
> > > > > >>lenses:
> > > > > >>Canon 135mm 3.5
> > > > > >>Nikon 135mm 3.5
> > > > > >>Hektor 135mm 4
> > > > > >>What would be your choice?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >135mm Tele-elmar not too expensive, and just fabulous and I mean
> > great
> > > > > lens
> > > > > >--
> > > > > >Alastair Firkin
> > > > > >
> > > > > >http://www.afirkin.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >http://www.familyofman2.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  ()" "'()
> > > > > >  (   '0',)
> > > > > >(,,)(")(")
> > > > > >--
> > > > > >To unsubscribe, see
> > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, see
> > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________________________
> > > > Yahoo! Messenger
> > > > Nueva versión: Webcam, voz, y mucho más ¡Gratis!
> > > > Descárgalo ya desde http://messenger.yahoo.es
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, see
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________
> > Yahoo! Messenger
> > Nueva versión: Webcam, voz, y mucho más ¡Gratis!
> > Descárgalo ya desde http://messenger.yahoo.es
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Copa del Mundo de la FIFA 2002
> El único lugar de Internet con vídeos de los 64 partidos.
> ¡Apúntante ya! en http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/es/
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

_______________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger
Nueva versión: Webcam, voz, y mucho más ¡Gratis! 
Descárgalo ya desde http://messenger.yahoo.es

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from ned@kajabbi.com (Re: [Leica] 135mm lens)
Message from "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es> (Re: [Leica] 135mm lens)
Message from "\(SonC\) Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug)
Message from "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es> (Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug)
Message from "SML" <leirex@access4less.net> (Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug)
Message from "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es> (Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug)
Message from "SML" <leirex@access4less.net> (Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug)