Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2002/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug
From: alex olstein <alexolstein@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:52:30 -0800
References: <3DD3F774000020E1@mta07.san.yahoo.com> <00bf01c28e36$6d6ddd50$70a72350@home> <003501c28e51$984d67a0$e96e9dac@aoldsl.net> <012a01c28e56$25f2b570$70a72350@home> <024d01c28ec1$1e3f6a60$02000003@dnai.com>
A few years ago I owned a very old 135mm Hektor and it was fine, and if my
memory is correct it even had a tripod socket. If your style of photography
gives you the time to set up a tripod, do it. It really makes a bigger
improvement in quality with a 135. Whatever lens you finally decide buy, I
recommend doing a test hand held and on a tripod at the various f-stops and
shutter speeds just to see how steady you are.
Alex Olstein
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from ned@kajabbi.com (Re: [Leica] 135mm lens)
Message from "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es> (Re: [Leica] 135mm lens)
Message from "\(SonC\) Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug)
Message from "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es> (Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug)
Message from "Roland Smith" <roland@dnai.com> (Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug)