Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/01/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600
From: "faneuil" <leica_korenman@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:29:02 -0500
References: <20030122145753.GA6119@panix.com> <5.1.1.6.0.20030122104236.009f36a0@pop-server.twcny.rr.com> <20030122164458.GC6119@panix.com> <3E2F87DD.5010908@webshuttle.ch> <008f01c2c33c$59729210$0200a8c0@c439786a>
Bit confused with the neopan thread.
So is rating it at 800-1200 a good thing?
I have a lab do my developing.
If I shoot it at 800 should I tell them to 'pull' it?
Eric
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Leeson" <pjleeson@mchsi.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600
> FWIW, here's a few I shot with Neopan at 1600, DD-X as Nathan noted.
> Scans OK, prints looked good to me with surprisingly fine grain at 8X10.
> http://www.leica-gallery.net/pjleeson/folder-3911.html
> Phil
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600)
Reply from "Phil Leeson" <pjleeson@mchsi.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600)
In reply to:
Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> ([Leica] niagra falls)
Message from Ernest Nitka <enitka@twcny.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] niagra falls)
Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] niagra falls)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> ([Leica] Re: Noepan 1600 (WAS: niagra falls))
Message from "Phil Leeson" <pjleeson@mchsi.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600)