Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I hear that at f2, from more than photographer, that it flares easily and that it is somewhat soft sharpness wise. Slobodan Dimitrov Jim Hemenway wrote: > > Not at all Slobo. > > Nope, it's definitely not a barker. > > I have the Schneider Xenotar f2 80mm and it's a great lens. In fact it > "snaps" quickly into focus and has given me some very sharp large > prints. > > -- > Jim - http://www.hemenway.com > > S Dimitrov wrote: > > > > You might want to feed the 80mm f2 a doggy biscuit for it to perform. > > It's a real dog. > > Slobodan Dimitrov > > > > Aka Yote wrote: > > > > > > Dear Friends: > > > > > > You may mant to consider the Rollei 600X. It has a very good metering > > > system from what Iīve been told and even though lenses donīt get as fast as > > > in 35 mm. They have an 80mm. f/2 and a 50mm. f/2.8 > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Aka. > > > > > > >From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> > > > >Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: MF rangefinders >Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 09:41:27 > > > >-0500 > > > > > > > > > What do you (and others) think about MF rangefinders such as the Mamiya > > > >6 or 7. I've bought and sold old Bronica's for the same reason you > > > >describe, and finally admitted that having a meter in the body is the only > > > >way to get many shots. Hi Phil, > > > > > > > >My biggest complaint with most MF rangefinders is they lenses are SLOW SLOW > > > >SLOW Another consideration > > > >might be a Rollei 2.8 TLR. It's light and small like a rangefinder, and > > > >has a reasonably fast lense.Regard, > > > > > > > >Austin > > > > > > > >-- > > > >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html