Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think we should have a homeland security home guard, with properly appointed uniforms. Kinda like the Greens in Germany. Ouch, damn that knee jerk! We could have block captains, monthly meetings, those kinds of things. We have the infrastructure in place like home owners associations, fraternal orders, AARP, you name it could be retooled. The D.A.R.E. program could be expanded to oversight on the neighbors, not just one's family. Ach du liebe! One can only dream for the return of order! Slobodan Dimitrov bdcolen wrote: > > THIS is REAL - and it should scare the s*%t out of every American - > liberal, conservative, libertarian or vegetarian - who has the least > interest in seeing the things America stands for preserved and > protected. If THIS is enacted, al-Quaida will have won: > http://www.public-i.org/dtaweb/report.asp?ReportID=502&L1=10&L2=10&L3= > > B. D. > > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Kit > McChesney | acmefoto > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:21 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] Does this mean we can't talk about Leicas????? > > Oh, we know THIS one isn't real, Jim, but the OTHER one, surely is (from > the Center for Public Integrity!). Unfortunately, it's an > all-too-real-sounding parody (of course, that is the nature of parody!). > > Take a look at the following, the report on Homeland Security: > > www.public-i.org > > KM > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jim > Hemenway > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:48 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Does this mean we can't talk about Leicas????? > > Folks this isn't real > > The server address, www.homelandsecurity.gov@subj.com, makes you think > that it's an official government address, but it's not. In fact, the > www.homelandsecurity.gov section is actually interpreted as a username > at the server subj.com. > > Go to the url: > > http://www.homelandsecurity.gov@subj.com/dhs/ > > Look at the sidebars about F16s for schools program and NSA secret > hideout > > Jim - http://www.hemenway.com > > Kelly wrote: > > > > Department of Homeland Security > > "For a Safe and Secure NationT" > > > > > > > > > > > > Clampdown on Internet Subversives > > - President says "we must stop this evil spread of ideas" > > > > Washington 2/5/03 > > > > > > > > In a far reaching announcement today, President Bush announced that an > > > imminent clampdown into the dissemination of subversive and dangerous > > ideas via the Internet. > > > > Announcing this new initiative alongside director Tom Ridge, the > > president said: "We must stop this evil spread of ideas. Far too many > > people are being exposed to thoughts and concepts that challenge those > > > things this administration stands for. The Internet is clearly an > > example of outmoded liberal ideas gone badly out of control." > > > > Director Ridge added: "It is unfair for the federal government to pass > > > the burden of this onto tax-payers and citizens. Instead, we are > > proposing that the cost be shared between web site publishers and > > those minority of the population who visit such things. Screening this > > > information is expensive and those costs must be passed on." > > > > The proposed charges will be in the region of $100 per web page to be > > analysed for content and 10 cents per page viewed by visitors, this > > charge will go towards an upgrade to the Carnivore systems already in > > place. Sites belonging to government agencies are exempt, as are sites > > > belong to Fortune 500 companies - Director Ridge said "We can trust > > major corporations to always act in the interests of the United > > States, so we do not propose to screen their content. However, in the > > current climate of terrorist threats we must consider everyone else to > > > be a potential subversive". > > > > Charges will be levied after 31st March 2003. For any queries or > > comments, please contact our press office. > > > > This article is http://www.homelandsecurity.gov@subj.com/dhs/ > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see > > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html