Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Welcome back, Don R. ;-) - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Don R. Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 1:05 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Journalism, altered photo's, and other ethical debates Were these photos taken with a Leica? With a Leica lens? This is just another OT post. Don R. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Collier" <jbcollier@shaw.ca> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 8:20 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Journalism, altered photo's, and other ethical debates > Actually it started out in the reverse. All we were discussing was > that > the mere presence of the photographer has an impact and changes the > situation: sometimes significantly. Some felt it was important to > realize this while others claimed it was not a factor in their > photography. There were no personal insinuations until they were > directed at Rob's work. > > John Collier > > On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 01:59 AM, Eric Welch wrote: > > > Exactly! The problem lies in people like Rob and others who say that > > the > > approach advocated by Tina, Me, the NPPA, Ted and others is not a valid > > approach because we somehow are making this mistake. But the mistake > > is that > > assumption - which is grossly inaccurate. > > -- > To unsubscribe, see > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html