Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well, I'd certainly question the D2H producing better photos than the D100. It's a camera aimed at taking fast photos, not the highest image quality. It may have more advanced software than the D100, but there is no way you could blow up a 4 megapixel photo as big as a 6 megapixel camera and get equal image quality. I'd have to see some hard numbers. But you are ignoring the fact that I was talking about a five megapixel difference. Why bring up a totally unrelated issue a one or two megapixel differences? On Nov 29, 2003, at 6:01 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > Which is why for instance the D1 series Nikon digital 5 Megapixel > cameras are considered to make a better image I think than the D100 6 > Megapixel! Maybe even the D2H at 4 Megapixel is better! > Eric Carlsbad, CA "The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." - -- Walter Lippmann - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html