Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Eric Welch wrote: > > Well, I'd certainly question the D2H producing better photos than the > D100. It's a camera aimed at taking fast photos, not the highest image > quality. It may have more advanced software than the D100, but there is > no way you could blow up a 4 megapixel photo as big as a 6 megapixel > camera and get equal image quality. > > I'd have to see some hard numbers. But you are ignoring the fact that I > was talking about a five megapixel difference. Why bring up a totally > unrelated issue a one or two megapixel differences? > The quality of each image pixel grabber might be more of an issue than you seem to think. As a matter of fact I'm sure it is. Not just the quantity with the quality being a minor issue. And could even close the 5 meg gap of which you are speaking. And "chaos and anarchy" are common synonyms call another post of mine "idiocy" and I'll make any further of your pompously denigrating posts magically disappear. Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.rabinergroup.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html