Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/12/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced)
From: Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 00:01:19 -0800
References: <r01050300-0921-F650A781263611D88AC25C10A1E6DFE0@[66.239.168.2]> <22575221-26C8-11D8-8437-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <p05100318bbf5b1770ab5@[10.0.1.5]> <C1834EB8-26EF-11D8-B6ED-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <p05100319bbf5e0c1306d@[10.0.1.5]>
Okay, so marketing information hasn't been forthcoming in the past. I'm
glad this information is out. But the fact remains that whatever comes
out of the camera at minimum settings is still the baseline from which
one works. And I choose Photoshop for that instead of some other
software that adds another layer to my workflow and one more
opportunity to mess up the original file's data.
On Dec 4, 2003, at 11:26 PM, Henning Wulff wrote:
> I'm sorry, Eric, but you're out to lunch on this. _ALL_ bayer pattern
> arrays need to be processed by some integration algorithm before
> anything else, and some cameras (such as the Canon 10D and digital
> Rebel, even do sharpening before saving as raw. See:
>
> http://www.robgalbraith.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?
> Cat=&Board=UBB8&Number=181319&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=all
>
> and specifically Chuck Westfall's (Canon USA) comments:
Eric Welch
Carlsbad, CA
http://www.jphotog.com
Never slap a man who's chewing tobacco. - Will Rogers.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
In reply to:
Message from George Lottermoser <imagist@imagist.cnc.net> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))