Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Fw: looking for line pairs with a stabiliser and a Leica and question
From: Jim Hemenway <Jim@hemenway.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:25:07 -0500
References: <002201c3ca60$965219e0$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8>

And... what were the effects of the simultaneous Laphroig versus 
Lagavullin testing?

:-)

Jim - http://www.hemenway.com




animal wrote:

> Sorry for the earlier empty post.
> Here goes.
> A collegue and myself wanted to find out if we could get 80 line pairs per
> millimeter using a Leica and a Kenyon gyro stabiliser.
> We could not find those data in literature so last night, while also doing a
> test of Laphroig versus Lagavullin,
> we decided to give it a try ourselves.
> 
> We scribbled some lines on a piece of paper with a group of line pairs one 1
> cm per pair and the other 5 mm per pair.
> With a Noctilux 18 meters away we calculated the image on the film to be 36
> and 72 line pairs per millimeter.
> We suspended the camera and running gyro from a bungee cord and started.
> First exposure was at 1/250 second and f1.0 going in stops to 1 second and
> f16.0.
> 
> Then we tried the same sequence while handholding the camera and bracing
> ourselves in a doorway.
> 
> By then we became to doubt the ability of a 4000 dpi scanner to resolve our
> results.
> While one would assume that 4000 dpi translates to 80 line pairs per
> millimeter,some knowledgeable people we asked suggested that 60lp/mm is
> about the best such a scanner can do.
> So we had to aim a little lower and did the same test with an aasummicron90
> mm and the stabiliser starting at 1/60 and f2.0  .
> 
> Although our test was hastily done it still yielded some suprises to us.
> The biggest being that the stabiliser clearly is able to permit shots at 1
> second.
> Others were that the noctilux was still giving good results at f 4.0 and 5.6
> and stayed that way until f16.(we realise that the focus shift of the lens
> could have been to our advantage at those apertures if we started out with a
> focus error).
> Also suprising was that at f 8.0 and smaller the summicron image is starting
> to fade.
> Lastly it shows that it is hard to find the testcard when handholding the
> camera.
> On the page the first column is the stabilised noctilux the second is the
> same handheld(stopping at 1/8th)
> and the last is the summicron.
> The film used was Kodak E100 GX .
> The  question is to get rid of focusing errors .can one set the lens
> accurately at infinity just by putting the index on thatmarkingAnd if so at
> what distance would one have to put the target?
> http://www.leica-gallery.net/apekop/folder-6004.html
> best regards
> simon jessurun
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 

- -- 

Jim - http://www.hemenway.com

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] Fw: looking for line pairs with a stabiliser and a Leica and question)
In reply to: Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> ([Leica] Fw: looking for line pairs with a stabiliser and a Leica and question)