Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]doug, i think you've explained this once already so forgive me, but what is the difference between 14127 and 14167? is there a difference if one has an SL2? thanks, - -rei On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 09:49:13PM -0800, Doug Herr wrote: > > Stan, you probably already know this, but functionally there's no difference > between the 14167 and 14127 when used on an SL. The only differences are > aesthetics and a pile of cash. > on 1/19/04 7:31 PM, Stan Yoder at vze2myh5@verizon.net wrote: > > > This is the Viso-lens-to-SL/R adapter. There is an earlier 14127 that would > > work on the SL (though > > meant for the original Leicaflex,) and I could get that, but wonder if anyone > > has a 14167 to spare. > > > > I have an SL on the way, and am looking ahead to using my Viso lenses on it. - -- Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com Ridgewood, New Jersey - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html