Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] MP vs. M7
From: Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:38:44 -0500
References: <BAY9-F36pe1NltsVECO00097a5f@hotmail.com> <401BDB9C.7000102@wanadoo.nl>

the 0.85 MP is my perfect M and main camera (leicavitted of course).

marketing gimmick, indeed.  

next thing, i'll be accused of being a dentist. 

:-)

- -rei



On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 05:45:16PM +0100, Michiel Fokkema wrote:
> Hello Eric,
> 
> I'd go for the M7. As you said the AE is godsend. I'm waiting for AE 
> since I used the CLE. In my opinion Leica is far too late (but better 
> late then never). The M7 is as well build as any other M and will serve 
> you, your children and probably also your grandchildren (if film is 
> still being made by then).
> The MP is very nice but is of course lacking the AE. I see it more as a 
> marketing gimmick, like the new 0-series.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Michiel Fokkema

- -- 
Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
Ridgewood, New Jersey

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Eric Ertman" <emertrice@hotmail.com> ([Leica] MP vs. M7)
Message from Michiel Fokkema <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl> (Re: [Leica] MP vs. M7)