Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have been buying my ink and some paper from: <http://www.atlex.com/> Their prices have been very competitive and they've been spot-on in shipping what they promised. My only connection is that I have choosen to buy supplies from them. Adam On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:16:39 -0500, Don Dory <dorysrus@mindspring.com> wrote: > Roger, > First, Ritz is retail so the Canon probably has a higher profit margin > and is in deeper stock than the Epson. > > The Canon will print 13X19, is very fast, and if your color space is > coherent will give you very good B&W prints. It prints best on Canon > papers and does a very good job printing on Epson papers. Print fading > will be severe in bright light and print life will be in the ten year > range. Mac compatibility will be OK. > > I have had the R800 since late August. Print speed is in the two minute > range for an 8X10. For me, it has produced wonderful prints both B&W > and color with out fail. I convert Kodak RGB coming off my scanner to > Adobe RGB and use that color space carried over to the printer. The > print preview is very accurate to the final image. I have run all kinds > of paper through my printer including the very thick watercolor papers > that have to be fed through the back. I have had no issues with > displayed prints in south facing windows although I have some pretty > fair overhangs so direct exposure is only a few hours a day. > > Epson pay particular attention to the MAC platform so there should be no > operating system issues > > So far, I have had no issues with clogging, banding, odd colors, or > other complaints with ink/pigment jet printers. > > I am pretty sure that I will acquire the replacement for the 2200 when > it comes out as I have found more need than I thought for larger prints. > Not having to change carts when printing on gloss then matte is a true > delight. > > Yes, I am a happy R800 owner. I would be an Ecstatic owner if the price > of the ink dropped as my local retailer loves to see my face... > > Don > dorysrus@mindspring.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf > Of Roger Skully > Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 9:45 AM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: [Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG > > I am looking for a new printer .Currently am using an Epson 960... A 6 > ink > dye printer. I have heard and read a great deal about the Epson pigment > printers, the Epson 2200 and the Epson R800. The R800 received rave > reviews > in the latest Mac World. I stopped at Ritz and the sales manager was > gung-ho > about the Canon i9900. I really do not need images larger than 8x10. > Longevity past 75-100 years is not a concern, I hope;-) Ink fade is if > it > happens quickly (5 to 10 years). I work off a Mac powerbook G4 running > OSX10.3.6 if drivers are a concern. Anyone have experience with any of > these > beasties? > Thanks > Roger Skully > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >