Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Curious decision by Epson on the 4000
From: abridge at dcn.org (Adam Bridge)
Date: Sat Sep 25 19:20:49 2004

I wandered into my local favorite camera store (Camera Arts in Sacramento) to
buy some XTOL. They had a Digilux 2 in so I played with it (boy I DO hate 
that
electronic viewfinder - shuddering) but liked the way it held although it was
boxier than I thought.

While I was forking over the bucks for the XTOL and some mounting tape, I 
asked
the proprietor if he had gotten in any of the 4000's. He had been very eager 
to
get them.

"You haven't heard," he said.

"Clearly not" I replied.

"Epson is keeping distribution of the 4000 in their professional imaging 
retail
outlets. We won't be getting any."

There are no Epson professional imaging outlets in Sacramento. To buy one I'd
have to go to the same place as I would for the 7600 or 9000.

This stinks. I figure I could order one from B&H or maybe from one of the
dealers here on this list, maybe. But to keep them out of the stores that 
handle
high-quality cameras - it's amazing.

Is there someone with some insight who can explain this?

Thanks

Adam Bridge



Replies: Reply from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Curious decision by Epson on the 4000)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Curious decision by Epson on the 4000)
In reply to: Message from leica at rcmckee.com (R. Clayton McKee) ([Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.)