Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Sat Sep 25 19:21:31 2004

Not to start a flame war, but it seems to be this is letting the cart
decide where the horse should pull it. If one prefers Tri-X to Delta
400, figure out how best to scan it, don't just switch films because the
other "scans better." I have to say, and I think have before, that I
don't get the complaints about scanning tri-x.....

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Jeffery Smith
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 4:44 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: [Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -
OT


Practical Photography touts the following three films as being good for 
scanning:

Ilford Delta 400

Agfa 100 APX

Fuji Acros 100

If you use and scan any of these three films successfully (i.e., find
that 
they scan WELL), please email me offlist with which developer you use.

Thanks!

Jeffery

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from hlritter at mindspring.com (Howard L Ritter, Jr) ([Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT)
Reply from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT)
Reply from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard F. Man) ([Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT)
In reply to: Message from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT)