Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ah, but that limitation is one of the real draw backs to digital - and being able to select the film whose look you most like is one of the advantages of shooting film. Again, I just don't get all the whining about scanning and film types...Tri-X, Fuji Acros, Delta 3200 -throw it in the neg holder and scan it....period. -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Richard F. Man Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 8:47 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: RE: [Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT At 04:50 PM 5/17/2004, B. D. Colen wrote: >Well, okay - Let your scanner decide what film YOU want to shoot with. >;-) Wellllllllll.... in some sense, this is no difference from shooting digital no? The digital sensor forces you to have one look, which you can post processing with curves and what nots to give you another look if needed (e.g. www.silveroxide.com and Fred Miranda's plug ins). Sure some people select one dSLR over the others precisely they may have more film like look (whatever that means) or whatever, and it is exactly what you just said here, no? // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard@imagecraft.com)