Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 50mm lenses should be compulsory.
From: aaron.sandler at duke.edu (Aaron Sandler)
Date: Sat Sep 25 19:21:39 2004
References: <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0405191638480.8779@hedvig.uio.no> <2906535AB89CD71199C70002A513ADBD0898A59D@exlon05b.lehman.com> <60B9146C-A99A-11D8-A6DD-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0405191638480.8779@hedvig.uio.no>
Careful, John, you'll run out of appendages!
At 02:14 PM 5/19/2004, John Collier wrote:
>Heck sometimes I have four M bodies hanging off various appendages. Not
>very often but it does happen. 24, 35, 50, 90 mounted and a 15 in the
>pocket. Oops I guess that means I need another body! One of these days I
>may even catch up to Ted.
>
>On May 19, 2004, at 8:39 AM, Daniel Ridings wrote:
>
>>>I often carry a 35 and a 50 as my only lenses. Many times on separate
>>>bodies to facilitate quickly switching between the two. This is what I
>>>do. This is what I like. You may well prefer a different set up.
>>
>>Is there any other reason to have separate bodies?
Replies:
Reply from abridge at dcn.org (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Those egrets? They ARE related to dinosaurs)
Reply from abridge at dcn.org (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] On the Farm near Lincoln, CA)
Reply from abridge at dcn.org (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Central Valley Sunday Morning)
Reply from abridge at dcn.org (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Central Valley: Onion Field)
In reply to:
Message from daniel.ridings at muspro.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] 50mm lenses should be compulsory.)
Message from nbeddoe at lehman.com (Beddoe, Neil) ([Leica] 50mm lenses should be compulsory.)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] 50mm lenses should be compulsory.)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] 50mm lenses should be compulsory.)