Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Sat Sep 25 19:24:02 2004
References: <20040714141433.LDEI1749.simmts12-srv.bellnexxia.net@straylight> <1089826065.4790.41.camel@failsafe>

????? what myth is that? I can't imagine how the two are equated.

On 14 Jul 2004 10:27:45 -0700, Feli di Giorgio <feli@creocollective.com> 
wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 07:14, Greg Locke wrote:
> > ...YET!  some clients now expect your bill to be lower because there is 
> > no
> > film and processing cost. They don't seem to get it that the job is not 
> > over
> > when the shutter snaps.
> >
> > Sometimes I break it down into "production" or creative time and
> > "post-production" or editing time.
> > ..and sometimes I just bill it all straight through from start to finish
> > regardless of the actual chore being done.
> 
> Sounds like the HDTV / MiniDV myth...
> 
> Feli
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost)
In reply to: Message from locke at straylight.ca (Greg Locke) ([Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost)
Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost)