[Leica] OT: Scanning B&W film via a Nikon LS-4000 vs. aMinoltaElite 5400

[s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)]

.....and digital spotting is a snap compared to Spotone 000 brush work.

Slobodan Dimitrov
Studio G-8, AGCC
http://sdimitrovphoto.com



On Aug 7, 2005, at 11:45 AM, Luis Ripoll wrote:

> Thanks for the advice Tina, on my case I spend more time on color ,  
> I never
> arrive to achieve a similar slide quality.
>
> Anyway, I think that LS5000 is better than 4000
>
> Saludos cordiales,
> Luis
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org]En  
> nombre de
> Tina Manley
> Enviado el: domingo, 07 de agosto de 2005 18:45
> Para: Leica Users Group
> Asunto: RE: [Leica] OT: Scanning B&W film via a Nikon LS-4000 vs.
> aMinoltaElite 5400
>
> At 09:00 AM 8/7/2005, you wrote:
>
>> Further, "acceptable" for what?  Displaying on the web, printing on
>> inkjet printer, which printer and ink combination, copying to CD for
>> family and friends, etc.?
>>
>> Ken
>>
>
> I've had no problems scanning B&W film, Tri-X, TMax, and chromogenic
> ones, with my Nikon LS-5000.  In fact, two of my best selling photos
> are black and whites scanned with the Nikon.  One of them just sold
> as a magazine cover for the second time and they've both sold as
> gallery prints.  Black and white just takes a little more work and a
> lot more spotting than color since you can't use ICE with B&W  
> negatives.
>
> Tina
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> http://www.tinamanley.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>