Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Elmarit 28mm (used) or Zeiss 28mm for M?
From: rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Thu Aug 25 08:24:19 2005
References: <8DFFA731-5BC1-493B-B6AB-92D9053539CF@mindspring.com> <430CB4D7.3000608@wanadoo.nl> <41B5BE67-1AC3-4EDF-BE38-0004D88ECA9A@mindspring.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050825105327.03215ad8@pop.med.cornell.edu>

Chris
Cannot agree about used lenses not being satisfying. Seven of my ten 
Leica-compatible lenses have been bought used; and I had no problem except 
with one that had a stiff ring and focused over infinity - and that was a 
new one. The others are all fully satisfying for me.
Didier

>After a few years of buying and using used Leica lenses my advice has 
>become:
>Buy new whenever possible (the extra cost in each case has been worth 
>while in the long run) Don't buy used unless you have an evaluation period 
>(which includes running a few rolls and/or sending it to Sherry even if it 
>"looks" good. Only buy used from original owners or experts like Sherry. 
>So the brand isn't necessarily the most important issue regarding 
>quality.  And A satisfying lens is priceless.
>
>Chris

Replies: Reply from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] Elmarit 28mm (used) or Zeiss 28mm for M?)
In reply to: Message from jdos2 at mindspring.com (Jeff Sumner) ([Leica] Elmarit 28mm (used) or Zeiss 28mm for M?)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] Elmarit 28mm (used) or Zeiss 28mm for M?)
Message from jdos2 at mindspring.com (Jeff Sumner) ([Leica] Elmarit 28mm (used) or Zeiss 28mm for M?)
Message from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] Elmarit 28mm (used) or Zeiss 28mm for M?)