Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Kenneth: Do believe I should go back to square one on my goth statement. It was italicized, and when re-reading my post it seemed clear. Yet, and that is a major yet, (but not quite of the Yeti class) it leaves room for misconceptions. Honestly, I've no real idea what goth is supposed to represent. Does it necessitate viewing photographs of the bizarre while a JS fugue thumps away in the background? There does seem to be a bit of latent S&M in both D'agata's work and Kyle's but maybe that has nothing to do with real goth. D'agata is,to me, is a realist. He is a world-class documentary shooter I find nothing erotic in his images and might (facetiously) suggest therapy to those that do. Sadness, melancholy , guilt and tons of remorse but no goth. Real life that, fortunately or not, many of us fail to recognize. Kyle, to me, is an illustrator. He comes up with an idea and carries it to fruition in a generally superb manner. My suggestion about viewing D'agata's work was meant to show (at least in my mind) how goth is a poor substitute for the real fantastic things the world presents us with. Walt