Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/12/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on 12/31/05 1:30 PM, Matt Powell at wooderson@gmail.com wrote: > It's hard to fault 'digital' photography, when the part that wore out > was mechanical (and presumably would have been in danger of failure > with the equivalent film body). The part would not have failed as quickly on the film body because on the digital camera the perceived variable cost of each exposure is zero, encouraging more frequent use of the shutter. Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com