Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/12/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: LUG Re: nikon D100
From: gwpics at googlemail.com (Gerry Walden)
Date: Sat Dec 31 23:59:39 2005
References: <22c93b290512311330m784a4f9bt56c3be8b2008acc7@mail.gmail.com> <BFDC7D8C.24D9%telyt@earthlink.net>
 
> The part would not have failed as quickly on the film body because on the
> digital camera the perceived variable cost of each exposure is zero,
> encouraging more frequent use of the shutter.
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com

I guess it depends on your viewpoint Doug. Is our 'task' as
photographers to produce images or to preserve equipment?

Gerry

--
Gerry Walden LBPPA
Web: www.gwpics.com
Stock: www.digitalrailroad.net
Tel: +44 (0)23 8046 3076
Replies: Reply from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re: LUG Re: nikon D100)
 In reply to: Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] Re: LUG Re: nikon D100)
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re: LUG Re: nikon D100)