Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] was Nikon film cameras now 1927 negatives
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Thu Jan 12 11:13:41 2006
References: <e5.233c8e84.30f802ce@aol.com>

Sonny,
I will have to steal back the negatives from my brother.  They are of far
better quality than the ones you show and possibly demonstrate how
devestating the water was to a better degree than a train floating on the
water.  It will be awhile as he is a hoarder first class and I will have to
accumulate things of more interest to him than the negatives.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 1/12/06, SonC@aol.com <SonC@aol.com> wrote:
>
> I rest Don's Case!
>
> http://www.nsula.edu/watson_library/1927/
>
> Regards,
>
> Sonny
>
>
>
> In a message dated 1/12/2006 12:50:44 P.M. Central  Standard Time,
> don.dory@gmail.com writes:
> The second example is a roll of 6X9  negatives that my grandmother had
> kept
> from her mothers family.  They  were images from just before to just after
> the 1927 flood on the  Mississippi.  The just before images show boats on
> the
> river at the very  top of the levee, possibly fifty feet above flood stage
> at
> that  location.  The following images are of ten feet of water as far
> as  the
> eye can see lapping at the porch of the plantation house. (When
> that  house
> was built they respected the river and built anything of real  importance
> way
> above ground)
>
> Today, those images will be at best on a  hard drive in some
> landfill.  Like
> Sonny, I am shooting film and  labeling negatives.  When I move to the dM
> I
> will have to print far more  than I do now.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] was Nikon film cameras now 1927 negatives)