Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] CLE... ?
From: telyt at telus.net (David Young)
Date: Fri Jan 20 18:14:35 2006
References: <A9CC5D6B-62F9-4786-9709-45C366F5A327@cox.net>

Steve Barbour wrote:

> I have been intrigued by a Minolta CLE body...a mint specimen, almost 
> enough to buy it...
>
> but I am concerned re its usefulness for an M shooter, it non- 
> compatability with certain M lenses, and in the event of a failure...
>
> trying to get it repaired, especially its electronic circuit board...
>
> your thoughts? yeh or neh..?
>
> thanks, Steve
> _____________

Hi Steve!

I had the original CL... I loved it's size and performance, despite 
being Minolta made. However, every time I took it on a trip, the 
rangefinder would quit. Bring it home, fix it, and it would be fine... 
until it went on an airplane ride. At the end of the ride, the 
rangefinder was useless. After 4 trips, I sold it for an R3!

However, despite claims to the contrary, I never had any problems using 
any M lens on it. I cannot imagine the CLE would be any different.

But, with Minolta/Konica being out of the biz, and with rumours that 
Minolta stopped fixing the CLE's some years ago, you may want to thing 
twice.

Good luck!

-- 
David Young,
Logan Lake, BC    
CANADA. 

Personal Web-site at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt
Leica Reflex Forum web-page: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm


Replies: Reply from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] CLE... ?)
In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] CLE... ?)