Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You know, you could all shoot Neopan 1600 which developed in Xtol at a dilution of 1-3 is really a 1600 speed film with normal density curve. 32200 is doable as a normal push at about 20% increase of time. Grain is fine and the tonality is still good. Just my 2 cents about a really underrated film. Don don.dory@gmail.com On 2/5/06, Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> wrote: > > Matt quit while yer a head! ;-) > ted > Ted Grant Photography Limited > 1817 Feltham Road > Victoria BC V8N 2A4 > 250-477-2156 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matt Powell" <wooderson@gmail.com> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> > Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 3:46 PM > Subject: Re: [Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA > > > > On 2/5/06, Didier Ludwig <rangefinder@screengang.com> wrote: > >> > >> >... neither Delta 3200 nor TMax 3200 is a true 3200-speed film. > >> Matt > >> What do you ecaxtly mean with "not a true 3200-speed film"? Just > >> curious. > >> Didier > > > > However ISO is measured (I believe it's shadow density at > > something-or-other blah blah blah, I don't do testing of that kind), > > neither of the 3200 films is a 'true' 3200 ISO (as Tri-X is a true 400 > > in certain developers, etc.). TMZ or Delta3200 at 3200 is underexposed > > (and then push-processed). > > > > This is all badly explained, I'm sure. > > > > -- > > MP > > wooderson@gmail.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >