Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think that people "should" try to find their own voices, develop their own styles, and cultivate their own vision so that it can be shared with other people. A bit too much like new age babble, but important none the less. If I understand your point it goes something like this. The Dvorak Cello Concerto ( actually there are two ) remains the Dvorak Cello Concerto no matter who made the cello on which it is played. If the same cellist played it on a different cello the tone and color might be different, but things might be changed at the level of matters of taste, but not in any significant way. The work of an artist transcends the hardware. Do I have it anything like correct? Because I agree with you. You can spot a piece of chamber music by Brahms from a mile away, even if you aren't familiar with the particular piece you are hearing, and it is nothing like Beethoven's chamber music. I think that the same is true of the photographic masters. I bet you could make a very accurate guess about who took a particular high level image, even if you hadn't seen the image before. HCB then remains HCB no matter what kind of camera he was using, and getting to the core of what his work is all about isn't about hardware. I have a question for the group which I will disguise as a question to you. What does it mean to imitate an artist like HCB? How will you know that you have succeeded in the endeavor to imitate him? I'll also offer an observation in the hope that it might generate some comment. I think that there are many areas of human endeavor ranging from photography to music to golf to god knows what which involve hardware and where you can observe exactly the same pattern. To a beginner the quality of the hardware used doesn't matter much. As you start to learn to play the cello you have to struggle so hard just to learn to hold the cello and get the bow to work that it makes no difference who made the equipment. You will sound equally bad no matter what. But, equipment does make a difference to people in the mid range. You do get to a point where a decent cello can help you grow and it can make you sound better because it isn't placing obstacles in your path which you need to overcome. I think that the upper stages equipment ceases to matter. I was at a master class with Yo-Yo Ma. He picked up a twenty-five hundred dollar student instrument so that he could demonstrate something. He sounded like he was playing his strad. I am sure that you and Ted and Tina could take prize winning pictures with a holga. Past a point hardware is irrelevant. Barney "B. D. Colen" wrote: > Hi, Barney - Of course I don't think that people shouldn't try. But try to > be what, and try what? -- Barney Quinn, Jr. (301) 688-1982 (O) (240) 535-3036 (C) (877) 220-0981 (P)