Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/10/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:M8 and the Future
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Thu Oct 26 05:41:07 2006
References: <c4b.629c076.3270021c@aol.com><22c93b290610241841k2d1d1d24xa9ce1a9482b3ccc4@mail.gmail.com><9376F541-A7F5-4BEF-ACB3-5965B7AD3523@steveunsworth.co.uk><22c93b290610251447k3dfb4b0fgec061c3e0f52bbaa@mail.gmail.com> <045FA9A2-131E-4C01-9D0F-DF170289D3AB@btinternet.com>
So that's around 3,000,000 cameras that will be sent to a trash dump in less
than 10 years.
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Dernie" Subject: M8 and the Future
> I read that Canon sold 250,000 EOS 350D per month. That is more than
> the total Leica M3 production, the highest published production model
> Leica ever. Canon can amortise the development cost over tens of
> thousands more units. They will always be cheaper.
> Frank
> On 25 Oct, 2006, at 22:47, Matt Powell wrote:
>
> > Even in the M6 days, you were party of a tiny minority, right? 1 Leica
> > sold for every 100 good Canon bodies.
Replies:
Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Re:M8 and the Future)
Reply from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Re:M8 and the Future)
In reply to:
Message from Afterswift at aol.com (Afterswift@aol.com) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)