Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] ISO 2500 and another topic- chimping
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Wed Nov 15 06:29:27 2006
References: <C180870A.181C7%bd@bdcolenphoto.com>

B.D.

Result verification? That may work well for studio set-ups but I'd not 
consider it for event work. I've labored under the apparent 
misconception a rangefinder allows "chimping" on the run. No mirror 
blackout, shutter lag, etc. and what  you see you get. Verifying 
exposure either comes with experience or a light meter. I will admit 
your descriptive abilities are as usual, very picturesque. I can see 
someone testing you theory by handing an M8 to a chimp. ;-)

Walt

B. D. Colen wrote:

>Let's not confuse 'result verification' with "chimping." Result verification
>- the digital equivalent of being using a Polaroid to verify exposure, etc.,
>is one of the great advantages and joys of digital. The term "chimping"
>refers to using a digital camera as a chimpanzee presumably would if you
>handed it a digital camera - shoot, look;shoot, look; shoot, look, ad
>infinitum - missing shots all the while.
>
>
>
>On 11/15/06 7:29 AM, "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Michiel:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I don't understand what's wrong with chimping.
>>>I thought that this is the great advantage of digital, being able to
>>>check your shot right away and correct if nescecary.
>>>Oke, if you're doing a wedding or trying to nail down the desicieve
>>>moment you should keep your eye on the vf.
>>>      
>>>
>>I see nothing wrong with chimping.  Especially at a wedding or when you're
>>trying to nail a decisive moment.  Not during the peak action of course, 
>>but
>>it takes less than a second to look at the histogram every so often to make
>>sure what you think you're recording is what you are recording.
>>
>>I'll admit it.  I've gone from a dark building to bright sunshine, and
>>forgot to change my ISO from 1600 back to 100.  After a few exposures
>>outside, I glanced at the histogram and realized my mistake.  I'm sure it
>>won't be the last time, either.
>>
>>Chiimping is a great way to break the ice with kids.  Even the most camera
>>shy kid likes to see pictures of himself, in my experience.  Right before I
>>started moving to digital and when I was still using entirely film, a 4 
>>year
>>old I was shooting had a hard time believing she couldn't see the results
>>right away.  After a few shots, she asked if she could see them on the
>>camera.  :)
>>
>>I don't use a hand held light meter before every single shot.  Nor do I
>>chimp after every shot.  Chimping is just one more tool that's available.
>>Like all tools, there is potential to use it both to your advantage or
>>disadvantage.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Eric
>>http://canid.com/
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>

Replies: Reply from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] ISO 2500 and another topic- chimping)
Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] ISO 2500 and another topic- chimping)
In reply to: Message from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] ISO 2500 and another topic- chimping)