Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 10:02 AM +1000 1/20/07, G Hopkinson wrote: >Marc, I hadn't thought of that regarding our >pupil sizes as we get older. It sounds >plausible. However will not the larger diameter >exit pupil allow for more latitude in >positioning your eyes against the eyepieces? >Surely also, the brightness will vary? >Subjectively, binoculars with larger objectives >are much brighter and more comfortable to use >to my older eyes. Nope. Marc's quite right. >Cheers >Hoppy > >-----Original Message----- >From: >lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org >[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] >On Behalf Of >Marc James Small >Sent: Saturday, 20 January 2007 09:26 >To: Leica Users Group; Leica Users Group >Subject: Re: [Leica] binoculars - looking for assistance > >At 06:14 PM 1/19/2007, Don Dory wrote: > >Marc, > >I appreciate the clarification, but in general have more capability than > you > >can use is better than less. When birding the over age dinosaurs seem to > >hide in dark thickets and deep inside fir tress and Magnolia's so I > thought > >a little over kill was a good thing. :) > >Save that it does you no good at all. If your >eyes in dark conditions only open to 4mm, then an >exit pupil larger than that is completely wasted >and of new use: the laws of physics forbid the >cramming of a 7mm cone of light into a 4mm >hole. And to get that 7mm exit pupil, the camera >has to be a lot heavier and larger than one with the smaller exit pupil. > >This is discussed regularly, as I noted, at both >Better View Desired and on a number of astronomical lists. > >Marc > > >msmall@aya.yale.edu >Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir! -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com