Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/10/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I just looked through a new Zeiss Ikon 21 finder next to a Leica (old) 21 and my CV metal 28. I have the Leica 21-24-28 as well. The ZI finder is trluy superb. Bright, sharp, undistorted, great framelines. Easily superior on performance to every other I have tried. It costs a LOT. An individual call on priorities and cashflow obviously. Cheers Hoppy >From: slobodan dimitrov <s.dimitrov@charter.net> >Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: 2.8cm v. 28mm metal finder >Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:50:58 -0700 > >Now what about the 2.1cm and the 21mm finders? >s. > > >On Oct 22, 2007, at 7:39 PM, EPL wrote: > >>The earliest Leitz SLOOZ brightline viewfinders were marked 2.8cm but are >>otherwise the same as the later ones marked 28mm. >> >>WA users for most of the screwmount era would have the screw-in TUVOO >>28mm >>converter on the VIOOH Imarect or the SUOOQ Albada-- neat designs, hardly >>price/quality alternatives today. >> >>I'd suggest the CV 28mm brightline. >> >>Emanuel Lowi >>Montreal >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Leica Users Group. >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information