Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Here's the first thing I found on my search for bad info on the 14mm 2.8D >ED.. > > > >http://lindapark.blogspot.com/2006/11/14mm-f28d-ed-af-nikkor.html > > >>From Linda > Slightly more to the point: :-) http://www.naturfotograf.com/14nikkor_review.html Note that this is from an avowed Nikon fanboy. His review is however very much in line with what I experienced. The Nikon 14/2.8 is 'sharper' than the Canon 14 (older one) but has more distortion. The distortion is a lot greater than that which the older 15/3.5 Nikkor produces, but in other regards the 14 is better. The Sigma 14 has slightly less distortion, and the Tamron 14 has a bit more. As noted before, the 12-24 Sigma zoom has a lot less than any of the 14's, but is of course a lot slower and not quite as sharp as the Nikon. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com