Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/11/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Mon Nov 5 09:22:17 2007
References: <C353DCF4.739E3%mark@rabinergroup.com> <519DD479-52C0-4301-9E8E-931B283E296F@comcast.net> <p0623090ac3547167b5d5@[10.1.16.153]> <910413C6-13D7-493F-BDBC-B30D2C297648@comcast.net>
At 7:51 AM -0800 11/5/07, Tom Schofield wrote:
>That's UWATE, Henning! I'm on a crusade. 28mm is till wide & 16mm
>is Ultra-Wide!
>
>Tom
On a film camera, yes. But on an M8, the WATE is WATE, and the MATE
is MATE. :-)
As soon as the 9-11-14 comes out we'll talk about the UUUWATE.
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from tomschofield at comcast.net (Tom Schofield) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)