Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Mon Nov 19 16:03:09 2007
References: <4740C660.9010507@wanadoo.nl><6af76ca00711191253v423fd54duf026364ad5dab8de@mail.gmail.com><BD743099-A9E9-473C-B069-AB6083A5AE11@charter.net><9A252848-82A0-4121-A856-3EFEA714FE04@cox.net><825BA71B-1D70-48C6-AF4C-7325F3910484@charter.net> <0B021C2C-34B8-4F39-868A-FA23658B39AA@charter.net>

Slobodan that lens looks like a gem, doesn't it? On Erwin's Leica liking, 
read his tests for many of the earlier designs. He notes
lower contrast, resolution, sharpness, flare resistance, correction etc on 
many occasions while still acknowledging their historical
position.
Cheers
Geoff
(hoppy) 

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
slobodan dimitrov
Sent: Tuesday, 20 November 2007 09:45
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits

...and let me add, that I'm seriously considering the 50mm Summarit,  
given its size. I might even give up my Elmar-M for it.
S.

On Nov 19, 2007, at 3:43 PM, slobodan dimitrov wrote:

It can certainly be a truism that Erwin has yet to meet a Leica lens  
he didn't like.

S.


On Nov 19, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Steve Barbour wrote:

as all lenses are a compromise,  these are a bigger compromise than  
most for Leica...

We have to wonder what Erwin gets from Leica for writing these lens  
tests and reviews...

hence, I'm not too sure he can be an objective and independent  
testing service...

but it's fun to read the stuff,

fwiw...

Steve



On Nov 19, 2007, at 3:25 PM, slobodan dimitrov wrote:

> Or maybe Leica just threw in the towel, on the basis that their  
> previous optics are beyond the capabilities of their current client  
> base.
>
> Slobodan D.
>
>
>
> On Nov 19, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Christopher Birchenhall wrote:
>
> Michiel
>
> Thanks for the link. Sounds like Leica have hit a happy balance with
> these new lenses.
>
> Chris B
>
> On 18/11/2007, Michiel Fokkema <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl> wrote:
>> http://www.imx.nl/photo/lenstest/summarit_lenses_part_one_no.html
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Michiel Fokkema
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits)
In reply to: Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits)
Message from crbirchenhall at googlemail.com (Christopher Birchenhall) ([Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits)