Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]They are all dogs. If you really, really need that half stop more than the
f/3.4 Telyt, go for the third version. In any case, good luck with framing
and focus and shoot with as contrasty a medium as is available because the
135 f/2.8s were about as dull a lens as Leica ever made. Trust me. Bow
wow.
Buzz
On 1/3/08 5:43 PM, "Michiel Fokkema" <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need the fastest 135 I can get for my M. It's clear that that is the
> 135/2.8.
> But there are three versions. First and second seem to be very close and
> they can't be distinguished without taking it apart. The third is
> supposed to be better. But how much better? Can the difference be seen
> in daily use when using slow speeds and fast film? wide open off course.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michiel Fokkema
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information