Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nah, quality-wise it is OK. Clumsy it is, that?s why I sold mine. All the best! Raimo K Personal photography homepage at: http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho ----- Original Message ----- From: "Buzz Hausner" <buzz.hausner@verizon.net> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 1:21 AM Subject: [Leica] Tele elmarit 135...A eal Pooch of a Lens > They are all dogs. If you really, really need that half stop more than > the > f/3.4 Telyt, go for the third version. In any case, good luck with > framing > and focus and shoot with as contrasty a medium as is available because the > 135 f/2.8s were about as dull a lens as Leica ever made. Trust me. Bow > wow. > > Buzz > > > On 1/3/08 5:43 PM, "Michiel Fokkema" <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I need the fastest 135 I can get for my M. It's clear that that is the >> 135/2.8. >> But there are three versions. First and second seem to be very close and >> they can't be distinguished without taking it apart. The third is >> supposed to be better. But how much better? Can the difference be seen >> in daily use when using slow speeds and fast film? wide open off course. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Michiel Fokkema >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >