Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/01/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:The new T-Max 400
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov)
Date: Wed Jan 9 20:41:04 2008
References: <30BB23E1-3745-4501-92DF-ED90843A2720@cox.net><47852436.1030307@waltjohnson.com><F43DE963-E72A-465F-92A7-8909C31A5285@cox.net><47852C85.5080207@waltjohnson.com><00e101c85317$306863c0$0200a8c0@robertbxucevjs><8455dfa10801091702o4f1e2a14p9d98ce105909ff1@mail.gmail.com><015c01c85329$a0c049a0$0200a8c0@robertbxucevjs><aed41d690801091746r1402cc90w86e8db5d2cc1fd55@mail.gmail.com><C2117952-9EA0-4BE7-ABC8-677F56CA6006@comcast.net> <aed41d690801091805y7d83cdf9w14307a7d8cb66f8@mail.gmail.com> <03c101c85339$975ffa30$0302a8c0@MacPhisto>
Having seen up close nearly a dozen Sexton prints, they are not
overly sharp. The same can be said for A. Adams images, of which I've
seen over a couple dozen. They are more interested in tonality, a
remnant from the early days of uncoated lenses, graded papers, and
scratch mixed chemistry.
A lowly Irving Penn print from 2? can blow theirs out the water
without any effort.
s.d.
On Jan 9, 2008, at 7:33 PM, Christopher Williams wrote:
Should be a good film, but they are using John Sexton to promote who
usually shoots large format so of course it will be sharp!
Chris
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffery Smith" Subject: Re:
[Leica]The new T-Max 400
> Sharper and finer-grained than BW400CN? That is saying a lot!!
> On Jan 9, 2008 7:53 PM, Leonard Taupier <len-1@comcast.net> wrote:
>> All the info on the improved film is here.
>>
>> <http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/bw/
>> tMax400.jhtml?id=0.2.26.14.17.14&lc=en>
>>
>> or
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/yun427
>>
>> Len
on
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies:
Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Re:The new T-Max 400)
In reply to:
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
Message from leica68 at gmail.com (parker haeg) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:The new T-Max 400)