Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Peter wrote: >>I agree that the "fly on the wall" approach is best in many cases. It lends a sense of objectivity to the proceedings.<< I prefer a sense of objectivity to true objectivity. Purely objective pictures are pretty boring. We've seen them. The type that are taken at short intervals from a camera that's hidden behind a little black dome, and mounted under an overhang on a building, and is being operated by a computer somewhere. They're boring even when the computer puts little dots on the face, and connects them, and then blinks like it found a match in a database, thus inferring that the subject is a bad guy and social threat. Hey, if it's a bad guy forget the dots. Just use some dramatic strong low lighting -- like a spot light pointing up from below the face -- and we'll all know it's a bad guy. If only the programmers had seen that photo of Krupp, or studied old horror movies. They'd have used low lighting instead of dots and lines. :-) DaveR