Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If your budget is that then you really ought to look at the 5D, it has lower noise than the D300 does and is only $300 more now, plus you have a wider selection of lenses from Canon than Nikon, and you have a much larger sensor. Richard Man wrote: > But Mark, the D300 and E-3 are within $100 of each other, and similar > weight and sizes so it's a fair comparison. The 1.5x crop vs. 2x crop > is not that much different, especially IF you prefer the 4/3 ratio. > > The D3 is a whole different class. It should be compared with > 1DsMkIIIOMGWTFBBQ, or the 5DsuperDuperMKCCIXV. > > My budget calls for the D300/E-3 (actually my budget calls for E410, > but I digress). If I lift weights and have more money, then the D3 > would be very good to have. -- Harrison McClary Harrison McClary Photography harrison@mcclary.net http://www.mcclary.net ImageStockSouth - Stock Photography http://www.imagestocksouth.com Tobacco Road: Personal Blog: http://www.mcclary.net/blog