Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have a Katz Eye focusing screen with the "OptiBrite Treatment" treatment installed in a D200. I thought my focusing was off using the OME screen. The screen is brighter making manual focusing easier. Darkening of the split image is minimal. Subsequently, I found the autofocus was off worse than my eyes. The camera focused in front of the target. I sent the body to Nikon a few weeks ago. I included a letter explaining the problem and illustrations. The camera body was repaired under warranty. Maybe the replacement screen does not void the warranty. J. Braun ------------------------------ Message: 16 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:35:45 -0500 From: Richard Taylor <r.s.taylor@comcast.net> Subject: Re: [Leica] Katz Eye Focusing Screens To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> Message-ID: <61DF9BB8-B039-48E3-9E7C-E72581AB0E55@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Len - For others not familiar with these screens, here's their web site: http://www.katzeyeoptics.com/page--Custom-Focusing-Screens--store.html The focus confirmation light on the D40x is slow and sometimes ambiguous in low light, so it isn't much help. Manual focus is faster but without a rangefinder or microprism patch, not terribly accurate. I only get about a quarter of my shots in focus manually. With my M7, is nail it most of the time. I did get a look at their installation instructions and it's not too bad a job, but a delicate one. Essentially, you have to release a tiny wire clip, change the screen and replace the clip. If I do go for the Katz screen, I will have my local Nikon repair place do it. One downside of changing the screen is loss of the warranty on the camera, but I'm hoping that having the Nikon guy do it will at least give me arguing points should I need to have repairs done before the warranty expires. I was surprised to learn they were in Adams, too. But then, that part of the state is home to a number of small, hi-tech firms (we used one of them in Deerfield on a satellite project) so maybe it's a spin off of another optical outfit. Regards, Dick On Jan 24, 2008, at 11:10 AM, Leonard Taupier wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Thanks for introducing the Katz Eye screen to those of us not > familiar with the brand. > > The D40X has focus confirmation built in. Doesn't it work? I find it > works very well on my D2X and D200. The interesting thing about the > Katz screen is they claim it doesn't darken in low light. > > With that said I found that the focus confirmation adapters I've > used on my Canon bodies are not that accurate. I installed Canon's > split image screen on my 1Ds Mk II body and find it gives me much > more accurate focus then the confirmation adapters for Leica R and > Nikon lenses. The issue I would have with the D40X is how to install > the screen. I don't think it's meant to be user changed. If you can > get by that issue I would be willing to spend the $98 and give it a > try. > > And I would tend to trust a company located in Adams, Mass. My end > of the state. > > Good luck and let us know what you decide. > > Best, > Len > > > On Jan 24, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Richard Taylor wrote: > >> If any of you have experience with the Katz Eye focusing screens >> I'd be interested in hearing your opinion of them. They offer one >> with a split image rangefinder and microprism surround that I'm >> thinking of getting for my D40x so I can focus manually in dim light. >> >> TIA. >> >> Regards, >> >> Dick >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information